Peter Was Not The First Pope

They teach that god passed peter's apostolic authority to those who later filled his seat (apostolic succession). Roman catholicism teaches that the apostle peter was the first pope and that there has been an unbroken line of popes since peter.

Saint Peter as the First Pope Date late 14th century

Of course, there was nothing like the modern idea of a pope then or for many years after this.

Peter was not the first pope. James, not peter was the spokesman who handed down the decision. Acts 1:13) and is sometimes the only one mentioned (lk 9:32). The title pope was unknown to the apostle peter.

Peter was important, but he had no special authority that could be passed on to a successor like the pope. The roman catholic church sites matthew 16:18 as their proof text: Peter was rebuked by the lord (mt.

One of those reasons was the audacious claim that peter was the first of an ongoing succession of popes. Peter was not the first pope! that at this time, our lord jesus christ, by changing simons name to peter, was making him the first pope and head of the roman catholic church, as well as establishing apostolic succession.

It does not mean that he cannot sin. Nowhere in his writings (1 and 2 peter) did the apostle peter claim any special role, authority, or power over the church. This teaching on the infallibility of the pope does not mean that a true pope, as the successor of peter, can never make a mistake.

Scriptural basis of the claim Catholicism is saying that salvation is not in christ but in peter as the first of a succession of popes. Recently a box of bones went on display as pope francis assured the gullible that the bones are the remains of the apostle peter, the first bishop and pope of the catholic church..

Even if peter the individual was the rock on which jesus would build his church, that does not mean that peter was the first of many popes. Peters role as chief apostle is evident in the fact that he is mentioned more than any other apostle, often speaks for the whole group, and is placed first in every list of the apostles. Even so, the term was rarely applied as an official title until the late 11th century.

Peter and that the bishops of rome did not become sovereigns of the church, but only confiscating one by one all the rights of the episcopate. Posted by don boys on december 28, 2013. Was peter the first pope?

Catholic popes would be given these keys of peter, to reign as pontifex maximus in rome, a title held by the caesars of rome as well. Peter's role in the new testament further substantiates the catholic belief concerning the papacy and what jesus said in matthew 16. She claims that peter was the first bishop of the church in the city of rome, and that therefore all this privilege and power was handed down in succession to all the bishops or popes of that imperial city.

The roman catholic church claims that it was founded upon simon peter, the apostle, and that this peter was the first pope or father of christianity. Well, there were only eight (some reported nine) bone pieces. Peter held a preeminent position among the apostles.

Briefly, the roman catholic church (rcc) teaches that the apostle peter was the first pope, upon whom god chose to build his church. you are peter, and on this rock, i will build my church. Peter never thought of being pope, and never acted as if he were pope.i conclude victoriously, with history, with reason, with logic, with good sense, and with a christian conscience, that jesus christ did not confer any supremacy on st.

Peter is not the first pope with supremacy over the church because of these two reasons just to begin with: Peter was a married man: This is the passage which catholics use to prove peter was the first pope and that the catholic.

From this belief they proclaim that the roman catholic church is the only true church because peter (and the catholic church) were given the keys, so to speak, to the kingdom of god and no other church has been given those keys. Many christians are shocked when i tell them that neither christ nor any of. We offer evidence to challenge that claim and to orate the tale of another peter who was the head of the religion practiced by this mother church.

The rcc holds that peter became the first bishop of rome. That christ built his church upon peter, and delivered unto him the keys of the kingdom of heaven. 20 reasons why peter not a good choice for the first pope.

What it means is that when a true pope teaches authoritatively on faith or morals to the entire church (i.e., from the chair of peter), jesus will not let that teaching fail. The answer, according to scripture, is a clear and emphatic no. peter nowhere claims supremacy over the other apostles. Was peter the first pope?

Peter was just one of the three close friends of jesus (mt. Peter denied the lord jesus three times (mt. Today we have the inspired, infallible teachings of the holy spirit recorded for us in the bible (2 timothy 3:16.

This was based not on the infallibility of a man, but on the infallibility of the holy spirit promised to the apostles in the first century (john 16:13; Peter was not the first pope! Peter was not the first pope, says reno omokri.

The former presidential spokesman stated this in an article, adding that peter and jesus christ were not christians, rather they practiced judaism.

Is the pope Saint Peter's successor? Pope